Which Artist'S Work From Chapter 1 Depicts The Events Of May 1963 In Birmingham?

Which Artist
‘Birmingham Race Riot‘, Andy Warhol, 1964 | Tate Warhol contributed this small print to a portfolio of work by ten artists. It was published the year after the non-violent direct action by civil rights demonstrators seeking to remove racial segregation in Birmingham Alabama. While the term ‘race riot’ was commonly used at the time, it is more accurate to refer it to as a race protest.

Warhol used a photograph of a police dog attacking an African American man. It was taken by Charles Moore and first published in Life magazine on 17 May 1963. The painting presents the oppression of African American citizens and police brutality. It brings up questions about Warhol’s decision as a white artist to depict Black suffering.

Was the image of violence being used to shock or to promote social commentary, attempting to bring news imagery into the rarefied space of the gallery? Gallery label, August 2020 Does this text contain inaccurate information or language that you feel we should improve or change?,

(30,960)

(21,603)

(16,416)

(12,454)

(5,776) (22,072)

(2,622)

(20,120) (4,873) (5,156) (26,467)

(13,323)

(17,390) (15,153)

(3,355)

(24) (10)

(6,584) (5,453)

(431)

: ‘Birmingham Race Riot‘, Andy Warhol, 1964 | Tate

Which artist’s work represents the events in May of 1963 in Birmingham Alabama?

“If empathy defines what it means to be human, then one day androids will be given this ability. If to be human means to have a sense of the sacred, then they will believe in God, will sense his presence in their souls, and with all their circuits firing will sing his praises.

They will have feelings and doubts, they will know anguish and fear.
They will express their fears in books that they will write.
And who will be able to say whether their empathy is real, whether their piety, their feelings, their doubts, and their fears are genuine or merely convincing simulations?” –Emmanuel Carrère Avoiding any revision of art history, can we ask ourselves, “Was Andy Warhol an android?” Androids are those “people” described by Philip K.

Dick in his sci-fi novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? made world famous by Ridley Scott’s movie adaptation, Blade Runner, Looking at Warhol’s Death and Disaster paintings, it is logical to question his empathy for the subjects he selected for his canvases.

Warhol never pretended to be a social critic; in fact, he was proud to be a socialite. His doubts, feelings, fears, and anguish were not about the society he was living in but about his place in society. We could go along with Warhol’s attitude and still enjoy his amazing work, his capacity to extract from the drama of the world the best possible images, transforming them into icons.

We could still go along with the surface and the superficiality and stick with his role in the art world and art history. We could go along with this simulation and his simulation, but Yes, there is a but, even for the supernova Andy Warhol, because history has changed and forced us to look at these works through the lens of our time.

In the last few years a few forgotten names have been brought back from the past: names like Edgar Ray Killen, the man who instigated the murder of three civil rights workers in Mississippi in 1964; Byron De La Beckwith, who killed Medgar Evers in Jackson, Mississippi, in 1963; and Thomas Blanton Jr., who participated in the bombing of a church in Birmingham, Alabama, in which four young girls were killed.

For more than forty years we believed in a simulation of justice, until these people were dragged out from their darkness in a series of atonement trials in which they were finally convicted for their crimes. It was not about truth and reconciliation, because nobody was able to say the truth or to be reconciled with that past, but it was about the final closure of an open wound within American society.

In the years of the civil rights struggles, Andy Warhol was pillaging the chronicles to build one of his most important bodies of work.
Did he care about what was going on in his country? Did he care about the outrageous reality that was unraveling under the feet of American democracy? My guess is that he did not, as many other New Yorkers did not, committed to the swinging rhythm of the roaring sixties.

He did not look the other way—in fact, he looked very carefully at what was happening—but he was able to neutralize and purify of moral content anything he could see as possible subject matter for his paintings. Jacqueline Kennedy’s sorrow at JFK’s funeral and the violence toward civil rights demonstrators in Birmingham had for Warhol the same aesthetic weight and social value.

Does this attitude make him guilty of something? In theory not, and I don’t know of anybody who has raised this issue, has questioned whether we can still accept Warhol’s genius without questioning his moral and political detachment from the dramatic events that were reshaping a society in which he, as an artist, was living and prospering.

I know that this sounds moralizing, but what we would have done if an artist working in the 1980s had exploited the imagery of the AIDS crisis simply for its aesthetic value, voided of its political and social implications? Warhol was spared the nightmare of political correctness, but that is not a justification for not taking a second look at a body of work that used issues without addressing them.

People were killed, lynched, burned, and discriminated against, and Andy was painting, Andy was dreaming of electric sheep, Andy was composing history using its music and discarding its screams.
He was doing all of this almost in real time.
On May 17, 1963, three photographs by Charles Moore of civil rights demonstrators being attacked by police dogs in Birmingham, Alabama, were reproduced as a double-page spread in Life magazine,

By the end of June 1963 Pink Race Riot, Mustard Race Riot, Race Riot, and other variations were coming out of Warhol’s studio. There is a disturbing synchronicity between the events that were unfolding in the southern United States and Warhol’s artistic production.

His hand seemed to dig into reality while it was still hot but with no fear of being burned.
He was extremely alert to the images pouring out from the news but totally detached from their implications.
He was no Théodore Géricault.
The latter made clear his sorrow and indignation over the tragedy of the Medusa, in which a group of sailors were abandoned to their destiny in the middle of the ocean following a shipwreck, an event that created a scandal in the French government.

Géricault painted his masterpiece, The Raft of the Medusa (1818–1819), without sparing the viewer any of the emotional implications of the event, and his work provoked the ire of the authorities. Warhol did the opposite, offering the viewer simply the beauty of horror, a very dangerous concept often applied to images appearing from the hell of the Holocaust (for example, photographs of mountains of shoes or of bodies in mass graves).

The seduction of repeated images, their balanced composition, the archaic stillness of the German shepherd in the foreground, act in conjunction to erase the humiliating vision of another dog biting the back of a black demonstrator, transforming the tragic document into a sort of slapstick. I don’t think that Warhol was at all aware of the effects of his technique and creative talent on the material he was using.

He was dramatically and desperately sincere in his renunciation of any political or social critique. He didn’t like what was happening, but he could not help liking what what was happening revealed. Images of death, disaster, and violence make news and mesmerize people, and that is what Warhol was interested in.

Average people like fame and fame by default, that is, death.
Andy Warhol was an average person and was proud of it.
Until trouble reaches them, average people don’t like to be mixed up with it.
Eventually trouble caught up with Warhol, through the delusional rage of Valerie Solanas, head of the one-person organization SCUM, but it was too late to transform him into an activist.

The reaction to Warhol’s first show in Paris in 1964 at Ileana Sonnabend’s gallery—which included Pink Race Riot, together with other Death and Disaster paintings—was mixed. The American poet John Ashbery, who served as the Paris-based art critic for the New York Herald Tribune, wrote that the work “marks a turning point in the Pop movement.” He continued: “From the beginning there has been a polemical element in Pop art, but it is one thing to poke fun at supermarkets and TV commercials, and another to use art as a means of confronting us with the raw terror of so much that happens today.

With Warhol his latest work is unmistakably polemical, or as the French say, engagé.
And he brings all his tremendous talent for meaningful decoration to the task of putting his message across.
His show shakes you up.” The French critic Gérald Gassiot-Talabot, however, writing in Art International, questioned the paintings’ validity as art, focusing on the technique rather than the content: “Warhol and his peers demand that we radically revisit the criteria for aesthetic appreciation—insofar as these artists assert, with often delicious cynicism, a conceptual and technical laziness whereby they prefer the methods of automatic reproduction to the vagaries and tiresome aspects of traditional craft.

Unfortunately, so long as the definition of art presupposes personal, voluntary intervention by the painter, Warhol will reside in that indistinct fringe of creative depersonalization where the refuse collectors of Nouveau Réalisme have erected a whole swath of current artistic practice, while possessing a human note that Pop does not.” The French and other Europeans did not seem to interpret this body of work as condemning the United States as a violent, racist society.

Instead they seemed to accept Warhol’s paintings as another manifestation of what they felt was the biggest threat to their monopoly on contemporary culture, engineered by the crassly commercial New York art world. Ashbery’s response notwithstanding, I don’t think that political awareness was yet dominating the discussion in any part of the art world.

A few more years needed to pass in order to see visual art become an outlet for the counterculture and radical politics. The civil rights struggle was a marginal and faraway event for the European intelligentsia. As Gassiot-Talabot’s comments suggest, the outrage in the art world at the time was not about politics, but about the disruption of the idea of painting.

The silkscreen technique was transforming the canvas from a surface into a screen. Warhol—along with Robert Rauschenberg, who in the summer of 1964 became the first American to win the grand prize at the Venice Biennale—was jeopardizing the future existence of those painters who were still discussing color and form rather than content.

The civil rights movement, compared with the crumbling of colonial empires in places such as Algeria and Vietnam, was probably for Europe simply a footnote from a childish society with a few growing pains. Andy Warhol’s art confirmed this idea of a childish society.

The revolutionary aspect was confined to its aesthetics, not its ethics. Today it is not easy to accept the kind of flirtation with the repetitive patterns of tragedy that Warhol transformed into some of his signature pieces. At the same time the detached commentary of the Race Riot paintings and similar works placed Warhol in the very limited realm of great artists who have portrayed the events of their day—a realm populated by names like Velásquez, David, Géricault, Delacroix, Goya, Picasso, and, I’m afraid, very few others.

It is perhaps a kind of natural aloofness, irresponsibility, or superficiality that allows a great artist to represent history as a work of art and not simply as a cold document. Warhol walked a tightrope over the gorge of frigid documentation, but his selection of background colors and balancing of negative space saved him from falling.

The background color became a kind of beautiful screen, mitigating the harshness of the subject matter, transforming the images into dreamlike visions rather than documents.
Whether motivated by cynicism or some mysterious philosophical bent, Warhol grasped the possibility that history and its tragedy are nothing but wallpaper for our identities and souls.

In saying this, I may be granting Warhol more credit than he deserves and a depth that he never dared to dip into. Among the painters who have succeeded in creating great works addressing momentous events, I deliberately left out Gerhard Richter, who perhaps produced the last great cycle of historical canvases with October 18, 1977, which commemorates the deaths of members of the Baader-Meinhof group, militant political activists who were part of the Red Army Faction.

Whereas Warhol was frigid toward his subjects, Richter has the remoteness of depression. His methodical way of painting and the murkiness of the images, as well as his selection of subjects, suggest the slowness of memory and forgetfulness. In fact, he began painting the October 18, 1977 cycle eleven years after the event, when the facts were on the verge of fading from the collective memory.

This gap of time gave him a credibility that spared him some of the accusations of exploiting a national and human tragedy. Richter never painted images of the Holocaust, carefully avoiding any confrontation with his latent guilt as a German individual.

But his method, like memory, does not allow for any atonement or closure.
All of Richter’s images are trapped in a limbo between feelings and reality, while Warhol’s bulimic capacity to swallow the moment and spit it out as another image helped the Deaths and Disasters to escape both feelings and reality and transform themselves into pagan icons, devoid of any moral weight.

In Philip K. Dick’s book, the main character, Rick Deckard, belongs to a quasireligious cult that uses a ritual instrument called an empathy box. In Dick’s future, people need this because they have lost the normal capacity to feel emotion. This small appliance allows its users to identify with another person by making them imagine that they are sharing the suffering of Wilbur Mercer, a legendary figure on whom the cult is centered.

They hallucinate images of Mercer climbing a mountain, experiencing fatigue, rest, sadness, joy, and so on. We find out at the end of the novel that this instrument is based on a fraud. Mercer is exposed by the talk show host Buster Friendly as a pathetic Hollywood actor fallen on hard times. Mercer appears to confirm the scam, yet that doesn’t change a thing, he says, “Because you are still here and I’m still here.” Warhol could have owned an empathy box; he could have been, and probably was, a sort of a fraud.

Yet that doesn’t change a thing. Today we could not accept Warhol’s superficial, apolitical positions, but—yes, there is another but—we are still here, and luckily so are his paintings. This essay originally appeared in the exhibition catalogue ANDY WARHOL/SUPERNOVA: Stars, Deaths, and Disasters, 1962–1964, published by the Walker Art Center in 2005.

Why did Henri Matisse violate the laws of perspective?

Answer and Explanation: – Henri Matisse deliberately violated the laws of perspective to put emphasis on the expressiveness of color. He used color to flatten perspectives and. See full answer below.

Which artist uses drips and running paint as part of the composition?

Which Artist These two paintings by Jackson Pollock, Composition with Pouring II, 1943 (left), and Number 3, 1949: Tiger, 1949(right), have been studied to gain a better understanding of the paints that Pollock used as he developed his drip paintings, the body of work for which he is best known.

Composition with Pouring II has been cited as one of Pollock’s first drip paintings in which he poured and dripped house paint directly from cans.
Examination coupled with pigment and medium analysis has shown otherwise.
In fact, Pollock executed much of this work in a traditional manner, by brushing swirls of yellow, blue, red, green, and gray artists’ tube paints onto a pre-primed canvas that was already mounted to a stretcher.

The pigments in these paints are all relatively pure and reflect an artists’ palette, indicating that Pollock was using good quality tube paints. A paint sample taken from the edge of the painting and examined in cross-section under a microscope shows a clear division between the three paint layers applied over the white lead ground.

The well-defined and progressive layering of these colors demonstrates that the artist allowed time while he was executing this work for one layer to dry before the next was applied. Only the glossy dripped black, one of the last paints applied, is definitely house paint. Based on drip patterns, these skeins of thick, glossy paint were applied with the painting laid flat, foreshadowing the technique that would come to dominate Pollock’s later paintings.

Painted five years after Composition with Pouring II, Pollock’s Number 3, 1949: Tiger represents a full-fledged breakthrough to his drip technique. With the unstretched fabric spread out on the studio floor, the artist dribbled, dripped, and poured colored paints in orange, silver, yellow, green, white, and black onto the fabric sometimes straight from the can, or with sticks and stiffened brushes.

A close look at this work reveals the decisions the artist was making in the act of painting. Some of the paints are matte, while others are glossy, and the lines vary from thick to thin and drawn out. In a few places, the intricate network of colors is so complex that it is difficult to establish an exact order of their application, and it is likely that Pollock went back and forth between colors, using them at both early and late stages of painting.

The wet-in-wet interactions of many of these paints, which can be seen on the painting’s surface where different colors blend and bleed into each other, suggest that they were applied close together in time—possibly in short, vigorous bursts of creative activity.

Elsewhere, the lower paint layer was dry before another layer was applied.
With few exceptions, the paints in Number 3 have all been identified as oil-modified alkyd paints, relatively newly developed synthetic resin-based paints marketed for coating interior and exterior architectural structures.
Pollock never spoke specifically about his paints other than to say that he preferred a “liquid, flowing kind of paint.” And, while acknowledging that he worked spontaneously with admitted chance effects, he asserted that he maintained control while making his drip paintings.

This study of just two paintings shows the shift in Pollock’s use of materials, from his reliance on artists’ oil paints in 1943 to the predominance of commercial paints in his work by 1949. As his method of working was evolving and as he developed his dripped paintings, the new synthetic paints seem to have met the criteria he was seeking.

http://sb.cc.stonybrook.edu/pkhouse/visit/contactus.shtml http://www.moma.org/explore/inside_out/2013/04/17/momas-jackson-pollock-conservation-project-insight-into-the-artists-process http://www.getty.edu/art/exhibitions/pollock

How did Anna Vallayer Coster create a focal point to focus our attention in this painting?

Color –

An emphasis can be established by creating strong contrasts of light and color.
In Still Life with Lobster, Anna Vallayer-Coster used the complementary color scheme to focus our attention.
By painting everything else in the composition a shade of green, she focuses our attention on the red lobster in the foreground.2

Which Artist Anna Vallayer-Coster, Still Life with Lobster, oil on canvas, 1781. Toledo Museum of Art (2445 Monroe Street), Gallery, 27

What event happened in Birmingham in 1963?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Birmingham riot of 1963
Part of the Civil Rights Movement
Location	Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Date	May 11, 1963
Perpetrators	Ku Klux Klan (alleged)

The Birmingham riot of 1963 was a civil disorder and riot in Birmingham, Alabama, that was provoked by bombings on the night of May 11, 1963. The bombings targeted African-American leaders of the Birmingham campaign, In response, local African-Americans burned businesses and fought police throughout the downtown area.

The places bombed were the parsonage of Rev.A.D. King, brother of Martin Luther King Jr., and a motel owned by A.G. Gaston, where King and others organizing the campaign had stayed. It is believed that the bombings were carried out by members of the Ku Klux Klan, in cooperation with Birmingham police,

Civil rights protesters were frustrated with local police complicity with the perpetrators of the bombings, and grew frustrated at the non-violence strategy directed by King. Initially starting as a protest, violence escalated following local police intervention.

The federal government intervened with federal troops for the first time to control violence during a largely African-American riot, It was also a rare instance of domestic military deployment independent of enforcing a court injunction, an action which was considered controversial by Governor George Wallace and other Alabama whites.

The African-American response was a pivotal event that contributed to President Kennedy’s decision to propose a major civil rights bill. It was ultimately passed under President Lyndon B. Johnson as the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

What happened in Birmingham in 1963?

Charles Moore / Getty Images On May 2, 1963, more than 1,000 Black children peacefully protested racial segregation in Birmingham, Alabama, as part of the Children’s Crusade, beginning a movement that sparked widely publicized police brutality that shocked the nation and spurred major civil rights advances.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) had launched the Children’s Crusade to revive the Birmingham anti-segregation campaign. As part of that effort, more than 1,000 African American children trained in nonviolent protest tactics walked out of their classes on May 2 and assembled at the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church to march to downtown Birmingham.

Though hundreds were assaulted, arrested, and transported to jail in school buses and paddy wagons, the children refused to relent their peaceful demonstration. The next day, when hundreds more children began to march, Commissioner of Public Safety Eugene “Bull” Connor directed local police and firemen to attack the children with high-pressure fire hoses, batons, and police dogs.

Images of children being brutally assaulted by police and snarling canines appeared on television and in newspapers throughout the nation and world, provoking global outrage. The U.S. Department of Justice soon intervened. The campaign to desegregate Birmingham ended on May 10 when city officials agreed to desegregate the city’s downtown stores and release jailed demonstrators in exchange for an end to SCLC’s protests.

The following evening, disgruntled proponents of segregation responded to the agreement with a series of local bombings. In the wake of the Children’s Crusade, the Birmingham Board of Education announced that all children who participated in the march would be suspended or expelled from school.

Who was the first artist to use perspective?

Famous Artists Who Relied on Perspective in Art – The first known picture to make use of linear perspective in art was created by Filippo Brunelleschi, but the artist Masaccio was the first painter who demonstrated the result of the new rules of perspective in art. Which Artist Pablo Picasso – Les Demoiselles d’Avignon, 1907

Did Picasso and Matisse fight?

Henri Matisse and Pablo Picasso first met in 1906, and would go on to follow each other’s artistic achievements for more than 50 years. Henri Matisse, Still life with sleeping woman,1940. Pictures: Supplied In its major summer exhibition, opening next week, the National Gallery of Australia will be telling the story of the lifelong exchange between these two towering figures of modern art.

Between them, they set the course of western art history in the first half of the 20th century, where Renaissance one-point perspective and Realism were abandoned for radical ideas about depicting the “third dimension”.
Both envisaged a new future for art.
The exhibition examines the intersecting paths of the two artists over the years, and the way they each responded to the other’s work.

No one was more attentive and aware of Matisse’s art than Picasso and vice versa. Both explored issues of space, movement, form, colour and figurative and abstract art, and then borrowed from each other to improve their own art. Their association was one of mutual awareness, recognition and artistic companionship, combined with a sense of competitiveness.

This artistic rivalry and collaboration began the new story of modernism. While both artists shared the determination to pursue new directions in art, they came from very different worlds. Matisse experienced a conservative upbringing in northern France. After studying law in Paris and working as an articled clerk, his world changed when his mother gave him a paint box at the age of 20.

Discovering a passion and a talent for art, he abandoned his law career and embraced a new ambition to study art in Paris. By 1901 Matisse was the leader of the newest art movement, the Fauves (French for “wild beast”). Influenced by the post-impressionists, Fauvism was dominated by solid forms and vivid colour applied with bold brushwork that evoked emotion and created an abstract sense of space.

Twelve years younger than Matisse, Picasso was a childhood prodigy from southern Spain, nurtured and supported by his artistic family.
As a young man, he moved to Paris to establish his name in the capital of the art world.
He initially adopted a modern fin-de-siècle style, inspired by Edgar Degas and Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec’s imagery of cabaret culture, brothel scenes and women at a bar or in a laundry.

This was followed by his Blue Period; imbued with dark and gloomy blues, his paintings reflect the poverty many people experienced at this time. Henri Matisse, Costume for a mourner, 1920 Although Matisse and Picasso saw each other regularly after their first meeting, Matisse was threatened by the arrival of the younger artist, and feared that his position as a leading artist was in jeopardy.

Despite their differences, both artists were united in their admiration of Paul Cézanne, who challenged the traditional one-point perspective by deconstructing three-dimensional forms on a two-dimensional plane. Their mutual rivalry was exacerbated by their different interpretations of the master. After Matisse and Picasso’s initial battle for supremacy played out early in the century, a period of intense borrowing followed, as the artists began to respond and feed off each other.

Perceiving the limitations of Picasso’s early Cubism, Matisse responded with greater emphasis on movement and the interaction of figures. Despite his aversion towards Picasso’s radical approach, he began to reconsider his talented rival’s achievements and experimented with incorporating the forms and muted palette of Cubism in his work. Far left, Pablo Picasso, La lecture,1932. Meanwhile, in another artistic setting, Sergei Diaghilev, impresario of the Ballets Russes, had been shocking audiences for more than 20 years with his ballet company’s daring fusion of music, dance and art. He collaborated on the company’s set and costume designs with leading modern artists, including Picasso and Matisse.

Picasso was the first to succumb to Diaghilev’s powers of persuasion. The two were introduced by French writer Jean Cocteau, with whom they collaborated on the 1917 cubist ballet Parade, After marrying Olga Khokhlova, one of the company’s principal dancers, Picasso returned to Spain with Diaghilev and choreographer Leonide Massine.

He drew on his Spanish roots for the design of the Ballets Russes production Le Tricorne, Its premier at the Alhambra Theatre in London in 1919 met with unanimous praise and it became a mainstay of the company’s repertoire. Picasso’s original designs were revived for performances at the height of the Spanish Civil War in 1934.

But while Picasso threw himself into life working for Diaghilev, Matisse had to be cajoled.
The shadow cast by the critical success of Le Tricorne finally persuaded Matisse to work with the Ballets Russes in 1919 on Le Chant du rossignol,
For Matisse, the project was extremely fraught.
He felt pressure to create something more wonderful and popular than Picasso, and was constricted by Diaghilev’s controlling oversight.

Caught between emulating the ornate style typical of early Ballets Russes productions and taking a starker, more modernist approach, he attempted to do both, an approach derided by critics. Above, Matisse in his studio, Boulevard du Montparnasse, Gisèle Freund, 1948 After the devastation of the First World War, life changed dramatically for Matisse and Picasso. A middle-aged Matisse abandoned his family, turned his back on the Parisian art scene and he went to live alone in Nice.

Picasso left his bohemian lifestyle for what his friend, writer Max Jacob called his Duchess period (l’époque des duchesses), presided over by his wife, Olga Khokhlova.
Both artists returned to a figurative style and a more traditional depiction of space.
Picasso travelled to Italy where he viewed Roman copies of Greek sculpture.

In response to both visual and literary sources, he adopted classical forms and gestures to create figures in delicate line drawings and prints. Picasso spent the summer of 1922 in Fontainebleau, where he drew on his imagination to depict monumental classical figures with a strong sculptural quality.

What famous artists use two point perspective?

What Is Two-Point Perspective? – Two-point perspective occurs when you can see two vanishing points from your point of view. Two-point perspective drawings are often used in architectural drawings and interior designs; they can be used for drawings of both interiors and exteriors.

Which artist is famous for her drip painting?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Drip painting is a form of abstract art in which paint is dripped or poured on to the canvas. This style of action painting was experimented with in the first half of the twentieth century by such artists as Francis Picabia, André Masson and Max Ernst, who employed drip painting in his works The Bewildered Planet, and Young Man Intrigued by the Flight of a Non-Euclidean Fly (1942).

Ernst used the novel means of painting Lissajous figures by swinging a punctured bucket of paint over a horizontal canvas.
Drip painting found particular expression in the work of the mid-twentieth-century artists Janet Sobel —who pioneered the technique —and Jackson Pollock,
Pollock found drip painting to his liking, later using the technique almost exclusively.

He used unconventional tools like sticks, hardened brushes and even basting syringes to create large and energetic abstract works. Pollock used house or industrial paint to create his paintings—Pollock’s wife Lee Krasner described his palette as “typically a can or two of enamel, thinned to the point he wanted it, standing on the floor besides the rolled-out canvas” and that Pollock used Duco or Davoe and Reynolds brands of house paint.

House paint was less viscous than traditional tubes of oil paint, and Pollock thus created his large compositions horizontally to prevent his paint from running.
His gestural lines create a unified overall pattern that allows the eye to travel from one of the canvases to the other and back again.
Sources for the drip technique include Navajo sandpainting,

Sandpainting was also performed flat on the ground. Another source is the “underpainting” techniques of the Mexican muralists painters. The drip–splash marks made by mural painter David Alfaro Siqueiros allow him to work out his composition of a multitude of Mexican workers and heroes.

What artist is known for his drip paintings?

“I have no fears about making changes, destroying the image, etc., because the painting has a life of its own.” Jackson Pollock In 1947 Jackson Pollock arrived at a new mode of working that brought him international fame. His method consisted of flinging and dripping thinned enamel paint onto an unstretched canvas laid on the floor of his studio.

This direct, physical engagement with his materials welcomed gravity, velocity, and improvisation into the artistic process, and allowed line and color to stand alone, functioning entirely independently of form.
His works, which came to be known as “drip paintings,” present less a picture than a record of the fluid properties of paint itself.

Describing his action-based process, Pollock says, “When I am in my painting, I’m not aware of what I’m doing.I have no fears about making changes, destroying the image, etc., because the painting has a life of its own.” 1 Though self-reflexive in nature, they readily inspire larger interpretations; the explosive, allover expanses of Number 1A, 1948 (1948) and One: Number 31, 1950 (1950) can be seen as registering a moment in time marked by both the thrill of space exploration and the threat of global atomic destruction.

During the Cold War, Pollock’s paintings and those of his Abstract Expressionist peers, including Mark Rothko, Franz Kline, and Willem de Kooning, were promoted, in exhibitions toured abroad by MoMA’s International Council, as emblems of the freedoms fostered under liberal democracy.
Pollock came to New York in 1930, as a young art student from Los Angeles.

While taking classes at the Art Students League, he pursued a close mentorship with painter Thomas Hart Benton and immersed himself in Surrealism and the subconscious; the mural painting of Mexican socialists David Alfaro Siqueiros and José Clemente Orozco ; and the work of Pablo Picasso, including his Girl before a Mirror and Les Demoiselles d’Avignon,

For several years, he worked for the Federal Arts Project of the Works Progress Administration (WPA). Pollock enjoyed recognition beginning in the early 1940s, with the support of critic Clement Greenberg and collector-gallerists Betty Parsons and Peggy Guggenheim. Under Alfred H. Barr, Jr.’s directorship, MoMA became the first museum to acquire a painting by Pollock, The She-Wolf (1943), out of the artist’s first solo show that year at Guggenheim’s Art of This Century gallery.2 In 1956, at the age of 44, the artist died behind the wheel of his car.

His wife, painter Lee Krasner, would do much to further his legacy after his death, including donating major works to MoMA’s unparalleled Pollock collection. The profound influence of Pollock’s approach—at once emphatically literal and radically open to the world—may be found in the words of his fellow artists.

The experimental Gutai group, which formed in Japan in the mid-1950s, cited his work as a crucial encouragement to “impar life to matter” and pursue “pure creativity.” 3 In 1958, Happenings impresario Allan Kaprow wrote in Art News in honor of the late artist: ” left us at the point where we must become preoccupied with and even dazzled by the space and objects of our everyday lifethese, I am sure, will be the alchemies of the 1960s.” 4 Nine years later, Minimalist sculptor Donald Judd would write in Arts Magazine, “It’s clear that Pollock created the large scale, wholeness and simplicity that have become common to almost all good work.” 5 Annie Ochmanek, Curatorial Assistant, Department of Painting and Sculpture, 2016 Wikipedia entry Introduction Paul Jackson Pollock (; January 28, 1912 – August 11, 1956) was an American painter.

A major figure in the abstract expressionist movement, Pollock was widely noticed for his “drip technique” of pouring or splashing liquid household paint onto a horizontal surface, enabling him to view and paint his canvases from all angles. It was called all-over painting and action painting, since he covered the entire canvas and used the force of his whole body to paint, often in a frenetic dancing style.

This extreme form of abstraction divided the critics: some praised the immediacy of the creation, while others derided the random effects.
In 2016, Pollock’s painting titled Number 17A was reported to have fetched US$200 million in a private purchase.
A reclusive and volatile personality, Pollock struggled with alcoholism for most of his life.

In 1945, he married the artist Lee Krasner, who became an important influence on his career and on his legacy. Pollock died at the age of 44 in an alcohol-related single-car collision when he was driving. In December 1956, four months after his death, Pollock was given a memorial retrospective exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York City.

A larger, more comprehensive exhibition of his work was held there in 1967. In 1998 and 1999, his work was honored with large-scale retrospective exhibitions at MoMA and at The Tate in London. Wikidata Q37571 Getty record Introduction Pollock was one of the leading proponents of Abstract Expression in the 1940s and 1950s.

His art, lifestyle, and untimely death have been elevated to the status of legend. In 1928, he studied at the Manual Arts High School in Los Angeles, and during this time was exposed to European modernism, analytical psychology, and Surrealist automatism.

In 1930, he settled in New York, and studied with the Regionalist painter Thomas Hart Benton.
During the 1930s he lived in poverty and worked as a mural assistant for the Works Progress Administration Federal Art Project.
His work before 1938 shows the influence of Benton, Albert Pinkham Ryder, and the Mexican muralists.

In 1938, he was hospitalized for alcoholism during which time he used automatic drawing as therapy. From this, Pollock developed his early style, one of totemic male and female figures and images of eyes or mythic beasts that constituted a personal iconography.

A fine example of this period is “Guardians of the Secret,” a work of late-Surrealist style and frenetic brushwork that would hint at his later mature style. He met the painter Lee Krasner in 1941, and they married in 1945. Pollock is best known for working methods of pouring or dripping paint onto a large canvas on the floor, moving about it as he worked, the entire art process being a kind of performance.

Typically moving from left to right as if “writing” the work, Pollock laid the key vertical and horizontal elements down first, mostly black or white, and then intertwined subsequent colors within it. This method of organizing a space into panels echoes Benton’s theories of mural composition.

MoMA Highlights: 375 Works from The Museum of Modern Art Flexibound, 408 pages MoMA Now: Highlights from The Museum of Modern Art—Ninetieth Anniversary Edition Introduction by Glenn D. Lowry, 2019 Hardcover, 424 pages Jackson Pollock Carolyn Lanchner, 2017 Hardcover, 56 pages Pollock: One: Number 31, 1950 Charles Stuckey, 2013 Paperback, 48 pages Jackson Pollock Carolyn Lanchner, 2009 Paperback, 48 pages Jackson Pollock: New Approaches Edited by Pepe Karmel and Kirk Varnedoe, 1999 Paperback, 248 pages Jackson Pollock: Interviews, Articles, and Reviews Edited by Pepe Karmel, 1999 Paperback, 284 pages Jackson Pollock Kirk Varnedoe, with Pepe Karmel, 1998 Exhibition catalogue, Clothbound, 344 pages Jackson Pollock Kirk Varnedoe, with Pepe Karmel, 1998 Exhibition catalogue, Paperback, 344 pages The Great Collections 1: The Museum of Modern Art, New York from Cézanne to Pollock, 1992 Exhibition catalogue, Paperback, pages Jackson Pollock: Drawing into Painting Bernice Rose, 1980 Exhibition catalogue, Clothbound, pages Jackson Pollock: Drawing into Painting Bernice Rose, 1980 Exhibition catalogue, Paperback, pages Jackson Pollock: Works on Paper Bernice Rose, 1969 Clothbound, pages Jackson Pollock Francis V. O’Connor, 1967 Exhibition catalogue, Clothbound, pages Jackson Pollock Francis V. O’Connor, 1967 Exhibition catalogue, Clothbound, pages Jackson Pollock Sam Hunter, 1956 Exhibition catalogue, Paperback, pages

Licensing If you would like to reproduce an image of a work of art in MoMA’s collection, or an image of a MoMA publication or archival material (including installation views, checklists, and press releases), please contact Art Resource (publication in North America) or Scala Archives (publication in all other geographic locations).

MoMA licenses archival audio and select out of copyright film clips from our film collection.
At this time, MoMA produced video cannot be licensed by MoMA/Scala.
All requests to license archival audio or out of copyright film clips should be addressed to Scala Archives at,
Motion picture film stills cannot be licensed by MoMA/Scala.

For access to motion picture film stills for research purposes, please contact the Film Study Center at, For more information about film loans and our Circulating Film and Video Library, please visit https://www.moma.org/research/circulating-film, If you would like to reproduce text from a MoMA publication, please email,

What is the name of the artist who popularized drip painting?

Jackson Pollock | Biography, Art, Paintings, Style, Death, & Facts Jackson Pollock is best known for his and works. For these pieces, many made during his “poured” period, Pollock dripped paint onto canvas to convey the emotion of movement. He explored themes including surrealist navigation of the unconscious and symbolism.

His early work depicts landscapes and figures with elements.
Jackson Pollock was born in Cody, Wyoming, on January 28, 1912.
His family lived there for 11 months after his birth, and Pollock never returned to the town.
He grew up in California and Arizona, where his father worked on a string of unprofitable truck farms.

Jackson Pollock lived in New York after moving there in 1930 to study art. He lived with his brother Charles and later in an apartment in with his brother Sanford and Sanford’s wife. When he married in 1945, Pollock moved to, where he lived for the rest of his life.

Jackson Pollock died in a car crash in the summer of 1956 at age 44.
He was driving under the influence of alcohol and was killed after he was thrown from the vehicle.
His lover, artist Ruth Kligman, was the only survivor of the accident.
Jackson Pollock, in full Paul Jackson Pollock, (born January 28, 1912, Cody, Wyoming, U.S.—died August 11, 1956, East Hampton, New York), American who was a leading of, an art movement characterized by the free-associative gestures in paint sometimes referred to as “,” During his lifetime he received widespread publicity and serious recognition for the radical poured, or “drip,” technique he used to create his major works.

Among his contemporaries, he was respected for his deeply personal and totally uncompromising commitment to the art of, His work and example had enormous influence on them and on many subsequent art movements in the, He is also one of the first American painters to be recognized during his lifetime and after as a peer of 20th-century European masters of,

Paul Jackson Pollock was the fifth and youngest son of Stella May McClure and LeRoy Pollock, who were both of Scotch-Irish extraction (LeRoy’s original surname was McCoy before his adoption about 1890 by a family named Pollock) and born and raised in,
The family left,, 11 months after Jackson’s birth; he would know Cody only through family photographs.

Over the next 16 years his family lived in and, eventually moving nine times. In 1928 they moved to, where Pollock enrolled at Manual Arts High School. There he came under the influence of Frederick John de St. Vrain Schwankovsky, a painter and illustrator who was also a member of the, a sect that promoted and occult spirituality.

Schwankovsky gave Pollock some training in and painting, introduced him to advanced currents of European modern art, and encouraged his interest in literature.
At this time Pollock, who had been raised an, also attended the camp meetings of the former messiah of the theosophists,, a personal friend of Schwankovsky.

These spiritual explorations prepared him to embrace the theories of the Swiss psychologist and the exploration of unconscious imagery in his paintings in subsequent years. In the fall of 1930 Pollock followed his brother Charles, who left home to study art in 1922, to, where he enrolled at the under his brother’s teacher, the regionalist painter,

(Jackson dropped his, Paul, about the time he went to in 1930.) He studied life drawing, painting, and with Benton for the next two and one-half years, leaving the league in the early months of 1933. For the next two years Pollock lived in poverty, first with Charles and, by the fall of 1934, with his brother Sanford.

He would share an apartment in with Sanford and his wife until 1942. Pollock was employed by the in the fall of 1935 as an easel painter. This position gave him economic security during the remaining years of the as well as an opportunity to develop his art.

From his years with Benton through 1938, Pollock’s work was strongly influenced by the compositional methods and regionalist subject matter of his teacher and by the poetically expressionist vision of the American painter, It consisted mostly of small landscapes and figurative scenes such as Going West (1934–35), in which Pollock motifs derived from photographs of his birthplace at Cody.

In 1937 Pollock began psychiatric treatment for, and he suffered a nervous breakdown in 1938, which caused him to be institutionalized for about four months. After these experiences, his work became semiabstract and showed the assimilation of motifs from the modern Spanish artists and, as well as the Mexican muralist,

Jungian symbolism and the exploration of the unconscious also influenced his works of this period; indeed, from 1939 through 1941 he was in treatment with two successive Jungian psychoanalysts who used Pollock’s own drawings in the therapy sessions. Characteristic paintings from this period include Bird (c.1941), Male and Female (c.1942), and Guardians of the Secret (1943).

In 1943, after the liquidation of the Federal Art Project, Pollock was given a contract by at her Art of This Century gallery in New York, and his first one-man show was held there in November. Very late in 1943, possibly in the early weeks of 1944, Pollock painted his first wall-size work, called Mural (c.1943–44).

This painting represents Pollock’s breakthrough into a totally personal style in which Benton’s compositional methods and energetic linear invention are fused with the free association of and unconscious imagery. Pollock’s evolution from this point throughout the 1940s shows a struggle to find a process by which he could translate his entire personality into painting.

The figurative character of works such as Totem Lesson 1 (1944) and The Blue Unconscious (1946) contrasts with the heavily painted, all-over design of Shimmering Substance (1946) and Eyes in the Heat (1946), indicating the range of imagery and technique he employed during this period.

Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content. In 1945 Pollock married the painter and moved to, on the southern shore of, New York. Krasner, whom Pollock respected as an artist, had already proven her ability to handle his affairs with Guggenheim. She also provided a stabilizing factor that he sorely needed, given his drinking and social awkwardness.

: Jackson Pollock | Biography, Art, Paintings, Style, Death, & Facts

What is the purpose of the focal point in an artwork?

Creating A Focal Point In Your Painting: 5 Techniques To Keep Your Viewer Interested ( Get sent straight to your inbox or on my social media.) The focal point in art is a key point of interest in your painting that you want your viewers to notice first. It is the most interesting point in the painting, and should help the viewer to understand why you wanted to capture the scene.

What is the main idea or the focal point of the work of art?

Emphasis – A Principle Of Art Sometimes a painting or drawing is a story. All good stories have a hero or, at least, a main character. Visual art can have a main character too. The main character does not have to be a person. An object or area within the composition can serve as the main character in an artwork.

In a story, the main character, sometimes referred to as the protagonist, is not hard to identify. In a book, the protagonist usually has the most dialogue while in a movie, the most screen-time. However, there is no dialogue in a painting and every pictorial element gets the same amount of screen time, or rather, “canvas” time.

So how do we, as artists, designate the main character in a painting? How do we get our audience to look where we want them to look? The answer to those questions is emphasis, Emphasis is the principle of art that helps the audience put the story of a painting together in their own minds.

What principle of art allows the attention of the viewer to a focal point?

Emphasis is the part of the design that catches the viewer’s attention. Usually the artist will make one area stand out by contrasting it with other areas. The area could be different in size, color, texture, shape, etc. Movement is the path the viewer’s eye takes through the work of art, often to focal areas.

What was the result of the march on Birmingham in 1963?

Impact – An agreement was reached – in exchange for stopping the protest it was agreed that lunch counters, rest rooms and drinking fountains would be desegregated within ninety days.

What was the 1963 civil rights campaign in Birmingham Alabama?

Birmingham, Alabama, Protests In May 1963, police in Birmingham, Alabama, responded to marching African American youth with fire hoses and police dogs to disperse the protesters, as the Birmingham jails already were filled to capacity with other civil rights protesters.

Televised footage of the attacks shocked the nation, just as newspaper coverage shocked the world.
This excerpt from CBS Eyewitness: Breakthrough in Birmingham, broadcast on May 10, 1963, includes televised footage seen by millions, as well as a brief interview with Martin Luther King, Jr., (1929–1968), one of the leaders of the movement in Birmingham, who discusses the importance of achieving success there.

Motion Picture, Broadcasting and Recorded Sound Division. Courtesy of CBS News : Birmingham, Alabama, Protests

Who were the key people in Birmingham 1963?

Which Artist Firemen turn fire hoses on demonstrators, Birmingham, Alabama, 1963 Photo by Charles Moore. Fair Use Image The Birmingham Campaign was a movement led in early 1963 by the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) which sought to bring national attention to the efforts of local Black leaders to desegregate public facilities in Birmingham, Alabama.

The campaign was led by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Reverends James Bevel and Fred Shuttlesworth, among others. In April 1963, King and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) joined Birmingham’s local campaign organized by Rev. Shuttlesworth and his group, the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights (ACMHR).

The goal of the local campaign was to attack the city’s segregation system by putting pressure on Birmingham’s merchants during the Easter season, the second-biggest shopping season of the year. When that campaign stalled, the ACMHR asked SCLC to help.

The campaign was originally scheduled to begin in early March 1963 but was postponed until April.
On April 3, 1963, it was launched with mass meetings, lunch counter sit-ins, a march on city hall, and a boycott of downtown merchants.
Ing spoke to Birmingham’s Black citizens about nonviolence and its methods and appealed for volunteers.

When Birmingham’s residents enthusiastically responded, the campaign’s actions expanded to kneel-ins at churches, sit-ins at the library, and a march on the county courthouse to register voters. On April 10, 1963, the city government obtained a state court injunction against the protests.

After debate, campaign leaders decided to disobey the court order. King contemplated whether he and Ralph Abernathy—SCLC’s second-in-command—should be arrested. King decided that he must risk jail. On Good Friday, April 12, 1963, King was arrested in Birmingham after violating the anti-protest injunction and was placed in solitary confinement.

During this time, he wrote Letter From a Birmingham Jail on the margins of the Birmingham News, in reaction to a statement published by eight Birmingham clergymen condemning the protests. King asked his jailers for permission to call his wife, Coretta Scott King, who at the time was home in Atlanta, recovering from the birth of their fourth child, Bernice King.

They denied the request. After Mrs. King shared her concern about her husband’s safety with the Kennedy administration, Birmingham officials permitted King to call home. He was released on bail on April 20, 1963. On May 2, 1963, more than one thousand African American students attempted to march into downtown Birmingham where hundreds were arrested.

The following day, Public Safety Commissioner Eugene “Bull” Connor directed local police and fire departments to use force to halt the demonstrations. The next few days’ images of children being blasted by high-pressure fire hoses, clubbed by police officers, and attacked by dogs appeared on television and in newspapers, sparking international outrage.

Attorney General Robert Kennedy sent Burke Marshall, his chief civil rights assistant, to negotiate between the Black citizens and Birmingham city business leadership.
The business leaders sought a moratorium on street protests as an act of good faith before any settlement could be declared.
Marshall encouraged the campaign leaders to halt demonstrations and accept this interim compromise.

King and the other leaders agreed on May 8, 1963, and called off further demonstrations. On May 10, 1963, King and Fred Shuttlesworth announced an agreement with the city of Birmingham to desegregate lunch counters, restrooms, drinking fountains, and department store fitting rooms within ninety days, to hire Blacks in stores as salesmen and clerks, and to release of hundreds of jail protesters on bond.

Their victory, however, was met by violence. On May 11, 1963, a bomb damaged the Gaston Motel where King and SCLC members were staying. The next day, the home of King’s brother and Birmingham resident, Alfred Daniel King, was bombed. Four months later on September 15, 1963, Ku Klux Klan (KKK) members bombed Birmingham’s 16th Street Baptist Church which had been the staging center for many of the spring demonstrations.

Four young Black girls—Addie Mae Collins, Cynthia Wesley, Carole Robertson, and Carol Denise McNair—were killed. Martin Luther King Jr. delivered the eulogy at their funeral on September 18, 1963. Nonetheless, Birmingham was considered one of the most successful campaigns of the civil rights era.

Who were the artists during the civil rights movement?

The Black Arts Movement was a Black nationalism movement that focused on music, literature, drama, and the visual arts made up of Black artists and intellectuals. This was the cultural section of the Black Power movement, in that its participants shared many of the ideologies of Black self-determination, political beliefs, and African American culture.

The Black Arts Movement started in 1965 when poet Amiri Baraka established the Black Arts Repertory Theater in Harlem, New York, as a place for artistic expression. Artists associated with this movement include Audre Lorde, Ntozake Shange, James Baldwin, Gil Scott-Heron, and Thelonious Monk. Records at the National Archives related to the Black Arts Movement primarily focus on individual artists and their interaction with various Federal agencies.

Search the Catalog for Records on the Black Arts Movement

What was the Birmingham campaign April to May 1963?

Birmingham Campaign (1963) – The Birmingham Campaign was one of the most significant campaigns of the civil rights movement. Lasting through the spring of 1963 in Birmingham, Alabama, the campaign aimed to draw national attention to attempts to desegregate the city.